![]() If you buy the solution for $100,000, the support and maintenance contract will cost you $15,000 per year. The annual maintenance cost is approximately 15 to 18% of the actual cost that you pay. We do not pay licensing costs on an annual basis, and we pay the support and maintenance fees once a year to ensure that we have the necessary support and maintenance. We paid a one-time fee for the license, and there is an annual maintenance or support fee for patches and everything else. When we removed AHV, we were left with the perpetual model. The first is the perpetual model, in which the license is purchased once and an annual support fee is paid, and the second is the Cluster model. There are two types of AHV licenses available on the market. We can purchase a subscription and have a specific piece of hardware and software available on the cloud. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? It is essentially self-sustaining. We don't have to intervene very often. We have the on-premises version of AHV, and as I mentioned earlier, everything grew so large that we had to move on-premises. It really depends on how you want your infrastructure to be designed. You can also have a hybrid model, as well as an on-premises model and a cloud model. It was just bouncing the servers and powering the bot.īoth options are available. The entire setup took about 15 to 20 minutes. We only needed to plug in the power and network to get it up and running. I would rate the initial setup a five out of five.Įverything was predeployed and preconfigured. There was nothing to be done the only initial configuration was to connect the cluster to the system, and that was it. Nutanix can send you those configured, pre-installed, and up-and-running systems all you have to do is bring it in and do the system. It was pretty straightforward all you had to do was turn on the hardware, and the software was already installed. Nutanix Management Cluster was the solution we chose, with Nutanix Prism running on top. We chose Nutanix AHV because it was obviously the easier option. We chose Nutanix AHV Virtualization primarily because we did not require other products, for example, when comparing it to VMware, we simply listed three additional products that we required to deploy the VMware hyperconverged option. For example, to deliver the same feature set as Nutanix Prism Central, we had to purchase vRealize Orchestrator, vRealize Operations Manager, Orchestrator, the NSX platform, and so on. VMware has already been used in several cases, but the issue was that in the case of VMware, we had to procure four to five different solutions. One was the product's technical soundness. To evaluate the product, we needed to consider a variety of factors. What we were aiming for was a private cloud server environment in which we could provide application services, infrastructure services, and other similar services for a fee. We used multiple platforms to evaluate the products. Spectrum Protect Plus, is an IBM product, that we are using for backup and recovery. If you want to install a specific operating system, you must first check to see if it is listed in the compatibility list only then will you be able to install it, and that is one issue for now. There is limited compatibility with the software that can be installed on top of Nutanix AHV, for example. It is not possible to integrate it with everything. If you want to install software, you must first ensure that it is compatible with Nutanix AHV not all software is compatible. Operating system support must be improved out of the box. VMware typically supports almost all of our systems, as does Hyper-V, but when it comes to AHV, we must apply specific patches in order to run it on top of AHV. That is one area where I would like to see some progress. ![]() If you want to install an operating system, or OS, on top of your AHV, only a few operating systems are supported. One issue we frequently encounter when using AHV is that if you want to install specific software, you must first gain compatibility. When it comes to AHV, however, you must purchase a separate set of third-party software, which can then supplement that backup via your IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. ![]() The issue is that it provides a higher VM level for VMware and other areas. We would like to see AHV's backup solution integration improved so that we can take VM-level backups directly from Nutanix. Because there isn't much AHV deployment in place, we typically have issues with the integrations that AHV has with backup solutions. They usually have very good vSphere and Hyper-V support. Many backup solutions that we use today are available for purchase, be it IBM, VMware, Veritas, or anything else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |